New poll has been posted.
What Character Stereotype Are You Most Sick Of?
#1-- Cool and Heartless Jackass.
This one is personally my pet peeve. These characters are in mass production. They're usually quiet, with this annoying view that they can't/should not be loved. They normally have really cool weapons and sometimes some humorous sarcasm, but overall they're pretty boring to me.
#2-- Peppy and Bubbly Misfit
Usually a girl character, which is fine because I'd be really creeped out if a guy was like one of these characters. This person usually yells "We can do it!" some time during the game. No one really cares whether she's there or not.
#3-- Sweet and Soft Princess
My 2nd worst pet peeve. She's too damn sweet to do her own fighting and she's usually spouting off some garbage about saving the rainforest or something. She never raises her voice. She's like a robot with a plastered on smile. It hurts me.
#4-- I Want to Rule All Bad Guy
See #2 on my Avalon Code post. This guy has been DONE.
How Are You Embracing the New Systems Like Kinect and Move?
Support Thick or Thin With Our Affiliates:
Polls
Writing Prompts
- Bad Guy (Character Development)
- Complicated Relationships (Character Chemestry)
- Describe Me (Menu Writing)
- Elf in a Forest (Mission Writing)
- Game Synopsis (Technical Writing)
- Handicapped Character (Character Development)
- Opening Cutscenes (Plot Writing)
- Princesses (Character Development)
- Signs of the Zodiac (Character Development)
- Two Characters in a Room (Character Chemestry)
Game Reviews
Spotlights
Characters and Dialogue
How the Ratings Work
Plot
1-- Weak. Cliche.
2-- Smooth, but not original nor incredibly exciting.
3-- Good try, but just short of really good.
4-- Really good.
5-- Excellent. Original and exciting.
Characters
1-- Generic. Boring.
2-- May not be as generic, but they either lack good depth or good chemestry.
3-- Original, but lack of chemestry between characters or includes bad dialogue.
4-- Good characters, but fall short of excellent because of a few features.
5-- Excellent. Well developed, deep characters with good chemestry.
Mission Writing
1-- Why did you bother? Bad writing that usually does not fit into the game world.
2-- Nice try, but the mission writing is still very weak and only semi-immersive into the game world.
3-- Good writing or immersive, but still weak in many areas.
4-- Well written and deeply thought out, but just short of really good.
5-- Excellent. Missions make sense in game world, it brings about depth into the game world, and the player actually cares.
1-- Weak. Cliche.
2-- Smooth, but not original nor incredibly exciting.
3-- Good try, but just short of really good.
4-- Really good.
5-- Excellent. Original and exciting.
Characters
1-- Generic. Boring.
2-- May not be as generic, but they either lack good depth or good chemestry.
3-- Original, but lack of chemestry between characters or includes bad dialogue.
4-- Good characters, but fall short of excellent because of a few features.
5-- Excellent. Well developed, deep characters with good chemestry.
Mission Writing
1-- Why did you bother? Bad writing that usually does not fit into the game world.
2-- Nice try, but the mission writing is still very weak and only semi-immersive into the game world.
3-- Good writing or immersive, but still weak in many areas.
4-- Well written and deeply thought out, but just short of really good.
5-- Excellent. Missions make sense in game world, it brings about depth into the game world, and the player actually cares.
No comments:
Post a Comment