Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How Are You Embracing the New Systems Like Kinect and Move?
Support Thick or Thin With Our Affiliates:
Polls
Writing Prompts
- Bad Guy (Character Development)
- Complicated Relationships (Character Chemestry)
- Describe Me (Menu Writing)
- Elf in a Forest (Mission Writing)
- Game Synopsis (Technical Writing)
- Handicapped Character (Character Development)
- Opening Cutscenes (Plot Writing)
- Princesses (Character Development)
- Signs of the Zodiac (Character Development)
- Two Characters in a Room (Character Chemestry)
Game Reviews
Spotlights
Characters and Dialogue
How the Ratings Work
Plot
1-- Weak. Cliche.
2-- Smooth, but not original nor incredibly exciting.
3-- Good try, but just short of really good.
4-- Really good.
5-- Excellent. Original and exciting.
Characters
1-- Generic. Boring.
2-- May not be as generic, but they either lack good depth or good chemestry.
3-- Original, but lack of chemestry between characters or includes bad dialogue.
4-- Good characters, but fall short of excellent because of a few features.
5-- Excellent. Well developed, deep characters with good chemestry.
Mission Writing
1-- Why did you bother? Bad writing that usually does not fit into the game world.
2-- Nice try, but the mission writing is still very weak and only semi-immersive into the game world.
3-- Good writing or immersive, but still weak in many areas.
4-- Well written and deeply thought out, but just short of really good.
5-- Excellent. Missions make sense in game world, it brings about depth into the game world, and the player actually cares.
1-- Weak. Cliche.
2-- Smooth, but not original nor incredibly exciting.
3-- Good try, but just short of really good.
4-- Really good.
5-- Excellent. Original and exciting.
Characters
1-- Generic. Boring.
2-- May not be as generic, but they either lack good depth or good chemestry.
3-- Original, but lack of chemestry between characters or includes bad dialogue.
4-- Good characters, but fall short of excellent because of a few features.
5-- Excellent. Well developed, deep characters with good chemestry.
Mission Writing
1-- Why did you bother? Bad writing that usually does not fit into the game world.
2-- Nice try, but the mission writing is still very weak and only semi-immersive into the game world.
3-- Good writing or immersive, but still weak in many areas.
4-- Well written and deeply thought out, but just short of really good.
5-- Excellent. Missions make sense in game world, it brings about depth into the game world, and the player actually cares.
No comments:
Post a Comment